United Kingdom Must Exit Customs Union To Take Back Control, Liam Fox Declares

This comes straight after a report of a possibly government betrayal. Liam Fox the International Trade Secretary has reiterated that the UK must leave the Customs Union if it’s to become a truly global Brexit Britain.


Making his case in China, Liam Fox told Bloomberg : “It is very difficult to see how being in a Customs Union is compatible with having an independent trade policy because we would therefore be dependent on what the EU negotiated in terms of its trading policies and we’d be following behind that.

“We have to be outside of that to take advantage of those growing markets. One of the reasons we are leaving the European Union is to take control and that’s not possible with a common external tariff.”


Fox’s Brexit comments after reports in the Financial Times claiming Theresa May’s advisers were conjuring up a secret plot to formulate a deal with the European Union that would greatly hinder Britain’s sovereignty.

The British government are becoming increasingly feeble and unfit for purpose, this is just another day of mixed messages. Time stops for no man or nation the British people are fed up with the cowardly government Brexit negotiations or lack of them.


British MPs Reject Petition To ‘Leave EU Immediately’

People in the UK are getting fed up with this so-called ‘Transition Deal’. Borders, law and sovereignty are very important to the British. MPs have rejected the petition backed by 138,107 people calling for immediate withdrawal from the EU, I mean why not? Who wants to wait years? The British people are ready to leave the authoritarian political club they call the European Union.

The public feel betrayed by Theresa May’s shamble of a deal that supports the continuation of freedom of movement, calls for ECJ rules and their superiority over British law and our territorial waters being usurped and our fishermen being stitched up for many years to come.

The petition, started by Brexiteer Jack Taylor was created in September and calls for the government to “walk away from the Article 50 negotiations and leave the EU immediately with no deal”.

The petition states:  “The EU looks set to offer us a punishment deal out of spite. Why wait another 18 months when we could leave right away and fully take back control of our country, lawmaking powers and borders?”

Peter Grant the SNP Europe Spokesman belittled the people who signed the petition, stating: “I genuinely don’t understand what people who signed this petition think is going to happen if we were to leave tomorrow without a deal.”

Labour’s shadow minister for Exiting the EU, Jenny Chapman made the silly claim:  “Nobody voted to be poorer, and to lose their job, for chaos, to be less safe – that is what would happen if we accepted as we are urged to do, the petition.”

The scary part is not one MP spoke in support of the petition, and according the BBC  “most of the leading Eurosceptics from the Conservative benches did not attend”. How disgraceful is that? 17.4 million voted to leave the EU and none of our MPs are properly standing up for Brexit.

The UK government made long boring excuse of a reply that we all know could change at any given moment:

“In leaving the EU the Government will seek the best deal for the UK maximising the benefits from leaving the EU – control over our borders, laws and money – while maintaining the greatest possible access to EU markets and continuing to work with our European neighbours on common problems. After withdrawal, the UK will bring an end to the direct jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the United Kingdom.

“The Prime Minister has been clear that the days of Britain making vast contributions to the European Union every year will end. The European Commission has set out the European Union’s position on the financial settlement, and the Government is undertaking a rigorous examination of the detail of this.

“The Government has already introduced legislation to ensure the UK exits the EU with certainty, continuity and control. A smooth and orderly exit is in the national interest and further legislation will be introduced to deliver that.”

The people of Britain, and especially the brexiteers are getting fed up of this long drawn out EU withdrawal date and the feeble effort from the Prime Minister to negotiate the UK getting control over it’s borders, law-making and fisheries.



French President, Emmanuel Macron: Demands More Cash For EU Deal From The UK

You’d think handing 44.5 Million to the French would get them on our side you’d be wrong. Our Prime Minister Theresa May has now suffered another embarrassing demand at the hands of Macron after he said the UK would have to pay up front to access the Single Market and allow the European Court of Justice to rule supreme.

This is what Theresa May gets for surrendering 44.5 million. 

Should we be surprised? Macron has had Theresa May doing everything she’s been told to and more. So he asks for even more?

The French President, Macron made this relevant statement:  “I’m here neither to punish nor to reward. I want to make sure that the Single Market is preserved because that’s very much the heart of the EU.

“If you want access to the Single Market, including financial services, be my guest. But it means you need to contribute to the budget and acknowledge the European jurisdiction.

“Such are the rules.”

Let me get this straight. ‘Theresa The Appeaser’ bribed the French with 44.5 million for Calais and even offered to take in some ‘Child Migrants’, and now Macron wants the UK to fill up the EU purse? This no country in Europe has had such a bad deal from their European counterparts since the German Empire signed the ‘Treaty of Versailles’. 


Theresa May: Surrenders £44.5 Million To France For The ‘Calais Problem’ And Yet More So-Called ‘Child Migrants’

Our feeble Prime Minister Theresa May has given in again, She has foolishly agreed to pay 44.5 million supposedly to pay for border security in Calais. The next betrayal is she has agreed to take in yet more so-called ‘child migrants’ while many children in the UK go hungry and without a home.

Reportedly the French president Macron threatened to stop security and police to stop guarding Calais unless Theresa May coughed up some cash. That’s what we get for saving France from the dictator Napoleon and saving them in two world wars.

The irony is that EU policies have literally caused all these so-called migrants from the third-world to come to our shores, it’s borders and security are and were a joke and so much so these profiteers literally were and are strolling across borders as they like.

I mean who can blame them for coming after German Chancellor, Angela Merkel said:  ‘It’s our damned duty to help refugees’ these people are supposed to be responsible for protecting citizens of their own countries not the whole world. She also strangely said: “ We cannot close our borders, we have got a 3,000 kilometre long frontier. We would have to build a fence.” It just goes to show you how little they care about their own people.

Just like she always does, Theresa May doesn’t protest in the slightest and does just as she’s told. She has literally negotiated a deal where the UK pays for border security in France and the UK takes in some so-called ‘child migrants’.

The British government should be plugging money into areas the security services at home are under-resourced and deporting illegal immigrants. The Tories have turned way to Liberal and have forgotten about vital services in the UK that need funds like the NHS, schools, housing British people and the military. The French president must be laughing at the British government.

The UK has been stitched up again.

European Commission doesn’t rule out extending UK’s Brexit ‘Transitional Period’ beyond 2020

The authoritarians they call the European Commission are debating if they should extend the strange ‘Transitional Period’  Britain has found herself in, even after Brexit and even beyond 2020.

Originally orchestrated as a period of two years for the UK to leave the 28-member bloc called the EU in name only. Supposedly we are leaving officially in 2019. Virtually nothing will change in our commitments and relations with the EU during this time.

The UK will carry on paying vast sums of money into the EU purse, probably still implement new EU law and regulations, let the EU dominate our territorial waters intended for our fishermen, the Free movement machine will continue to run, and the EU court will continue to be supreme. But I doubt we will be allowed to send our MEP’s to the EU parliament or be in attendance in of the meetings of the European Council.

Key brexit campaigner & former UKIP leader Nigel Farage has had his say on these conditions at the moment as “not a deal” but “capitulation”.

And now the EU is thinking about whether it should or not it should extend the watered down Brexit to 2020 or even beyond that, a number of ambassadors from some of the EU-member states talking about it in Brussels on 10th January.

“The Commission didn’t rule out that ‘the transition period’ could be prolonged.” a diplomat was was there at the time told POLITICO.

The worrying thing is that the UK could be blackmailed into handing away more money, even more than Theresa May and her government dominated by remainers agreed to pay. The EU budget commences in 2021.

One diplomat said: “If there’s an extension that overlaps with the new budget, London will have to pay,”

Nigel Farage envisioned this scheming tactic a long time ago, with EU fanatics on this side of the channel and theirs constantly finding reasons to delay the UK leaving the EU until they can find an excuse to  put a nail in the works.

“It took nine months to trigger Article 50, for reasons I’ve never yet worked out. We were then told, once it was triggered, ‘Just wait another two years; it’ll all be fine’,” Farage declared.

“Now we’re told, wait another two years ‘after that’, and I worry, with the complete lack of vision that this government’s got, that at the end of that two or three year period, we’ll be told ‘Well, we just need a few more years’. He went on to say.

“Let’s be clear: we’ve had the arguments over trade, tariffs, borders — that was what the referendum was about. It was settled,” Farage explained.

Farage is right about everything he has said. The 17.4 million Brexiteers did not vote for a transitional period, they did not vote for European Court of Justice to go on dictating laws to us in our own country, they did not vote to continue mass unchecked immigration into their country, and we certainly did not vote to carry on paying money or give them a 40 billion pound bribe to let us leave.


UK Government desperately needs to hold a Public Enquiry into ‘Saudi Arabia’s’ funding of Islamic Extremism in the UK

We call upon the British government to hold a full-blown public enquiry into the Gulf States irresponsible funding of Islamic extremism/ terror in the UK, according to the think-tank the Henry Jackson Society & all of us here at Patriotic People’s Populist Media.

The report conducted by the Henry Jackson Society said “In the UK this funding has primarily taken the form of endowments to mosques and Islamic
educational institutions, which have in turn played host to extremist preachers and the distribution of extremist literature. Influence has also been exerted through the training of British Muslim religious leaders in Saudi Arabia, as well as the use of Saudi textbooks in a number of the UK’s independent Islamic schools.”

The think-tank also went on to say “The kingdom’s 60-year campaign to export hardline Wahhabi Islam has led to support for mosques and Islamic institutions that appear to have links to extremism” obviously talking about Saudi Arabia.

The report does not exclusively blame Saudi Arabia for the funding of Islamic extremism in the UK, it went on to say “The Qatari funded al-Muntada Trust, there appear
to be significant links. The trust is not only financed by Qatar but in 2013 the UK branch held its annual conference in Doha. The trust has been connected with a number of mosques where radicalisation has taken place. Specifically, in the case of a group of young British men from Cardiff, it has been suggested that attendance at the al-Muntada linked al-Manar Mosque was significant in their radicalisation and decision to travel to Syria and join the Islamic State.”

In Austria the foreign funding of mosques has been banned.

Even Labour MP, Dan Jarvis said “This report from the Henry Jackson Society sheds light on what are extremely worrying links between Saudi Arabia and the funding of extremism here in the UK.”

Theresa May’s four-point plan to end extremism & defeat terror 

  1. Tougher sentences for terror offences
  2. Less tolerance of extremism
  3. Holding online social media giants to account
  4. Reinforce British values

Foreign funding for Islamic Extremism in the UK seems to come from three states in the Gulf in particular Iran, Qatar & Saudi Arabia so why aren’t we placing massive sanctions on these countries? And exposing them for the terrorist sympathisers they really are.

The author of the report Tom Wilson said “There is a clear and growing link between foreign funding of Islamist extremism and the violent terrorism we have witnessed across the UK and Europe.

“The key now is to get ahead of the issue and find out the full extent of what has been going on. A public inquiry would go some way to informing the debate.

“While entities from across the Gulf and Iran have been guilty of advancing extremism, those in Saudi Arabia are undoubtedly at the top of the list.

“Research indicates that some Saudi individuals and foundations have been apparently heavily involved in exporting an illiberal, bigoted Wahhabi ideology.”

Britain’s policy makers unfortunately are square pegs in a round hole when it comes to tackling issues like this, but this is not something we can ignore and hope goes away because it will not. USA, Austria & France have all made different measures in the past to stump foreign organisations or governments funding extremism and mosques so why the hell hasn’t Britain? We have heard very little about this since January, 2016 when former Prime Minister David Cameron acknowledged that there
is a problem of Saudi funded education programmes in the UK that may be responsible for promoting Islamist extremism. But since then almost nothing… The government’s in Europe and the West need to start taking Gulf States funding hard-line religious indoctrination in our countries which leads to a radical fifth-column in our countries who want nothing more then to destroy us and our culture.

Theresa May if you are reading this, which I doubt you are please address the problem with the Gulf States funding Islamic extremism in the UK before we end up with varied Islamic terrorist factions in the UK like there is in Syria and hold a full-blown public enquiry into it.

Twisting the Truth: British Government to remove Students from Immigration Data

British Prime Minister, Theresa May set to pander to left-wing appeasers in her own party in an attempt to distort the real UK immigration statistics.

Leading left-wing or leftist appeasing Conservatives have been desperately attempting to appeal to the Prime Minister to remove the student’s from the nation’s immigration figures, removing this data helps the government to pretend they are reducing the numbers of people coming to the UK down to the tens-of thousands which has long been their goal.

This foolish stratagem is a blatant attempt to trick people that want tighter immigration controls and Brexiteer’s by making the figures look more acceptable and make their arguments less valid.

The last few decades immigration has reached record breaking heights in the UK, creating a very dangerous strain on the nations infrastructure, obviously the NHS, Schools in the UK , Police Service and integration.

Maybe we shouldn’t be surprised that the Scottish Conservatives MP’s are behind this move led by Ruth Davidson, and that’s along with Amber Rudd the apparently now lefty Home Secretary they want to remove 75,000 people a year to aide their deceit from the British public.

A source from the UK government told the Daily Mail just this week:  “It is inevitable that someone will bring forward an amendment on this, and it is very difficult to see how we could defeat it.”

The report also included this info:

Aout 438,000 foreign students are currently studying here. Removing them from the statistics could make a significant difference to headline immigration figures.
Mrs May resisted the move for years as home secretary, warning that it would be seen by voters as an attempt to ‘fiddle the figures’. She said keeping foreign students in the statistics would maintain pressure on universities to root out bogus students.
Mrs May also cited research suggesting up to 100,000 foreign students a year failed to return home after graduating. But supporters of the change argue that exit checks show the vast majority of foreign students do not overstay

Just in March Financial Times went through the argument of favouring the student numbers being kept in the figures.

George Freeman former science minister & head of Mrs May’s policy board told Sky News: “I think it is very important that we signal we are open to Britain as an education beacon of the world. It is one of our great industries. I want to bring more students here,” he said.

Net migration plummeted 100,000in the year to June following the referendum but is still well off that Conservative target [of 100,000] at 230,000. The number of students coming to the UK fell by 23,000 to 141,000 over the same period.

Brexiteer & former MP of Aldershot, Sir Gerald Howarth had this to say last month: “The numbers are still far too high and this must be addressed as soon as Britain leaves the EU in March 2019. The Government should adopt a British work permit system to cut net migration to sustainable levels last seen in the mid 1990s.”